Headline: Banging the gong for Hong Kong

Byline: Donald Tsang is due to undertake his first overseas trip as Hong Kong's leader this week to promote the city and meet world leaders. But is the hard sell of 'Asia's World City' necessary, asks Peter Kammerer

Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen is already subconsciously choosing which bow ties to take on his first overseas trips since taking office three months ago. One of the more conservative ones will do for the meeting with US President George W. Bush later this month, while something a little flashier is probably in order for the session with Britain's Prime Minister, Tony Blair - perhaps something with big, red spots or in vivid yellow.

The ties will certainly set Mr Tsang apart from his predecessor, Tung Chee-hwa, who cut a less than colourful figure when he met Mr Bush in 2001 and Mr Blair two years later. What sort of a reception he will get is uncertain, though - his style is certainly different to Mr Tung's, but Hong Kong is no nearer internationally-sought democratic freedoms and many perceive it to be slipping behind the glitter of mainland China's dramatic rise.

In announcing the visits last Monday to Canada and the US starting this week and Britain early next month, Mr Tsang did not reveal concern about being grilled on any of Hong Kong's shortcomings. But the high-level government and business delegations accompanying him would seem to reveal otherwise.

When he lands in Vancouver next weekend for meetings with British Columbia province officials and business people, Hong Kong's image will be foremost in his mind. His biggest problem is that beyond global corporations looking for a base for their Asia-Pacific headquarters, Hong Kong would not appear to be on too many other minds.

Americans, Britons and Canadians spoken to last week agreed that Hong Kong rarely got mentioned in their media. American travel consultant Sophia Kulich, who visited recently, was full of praise for the services, value for money and friendliness she encountered, but baffled by the lack of promotion of the city in the US.

"I think Americans would like to visit Hong Kong, but there is not enough awareness because of a lack of promotion," Ms Kulich, whose firm, E&M Travel is based in Westport, Connecticut, said. "There were commercials on television several years ago, but I have not seen anything since."

Senior Canadian journalist Estanislao Oziewicz encapsulated the views: "At one time, Hong Kong was on everyone's mind, but that's tailed off a lot since the handover.

"Part of that is that Hong Kong, to me, was always a really vibrant place and at least in perception, it's lost a lot of that," the world affairs reporter for the Globe and Mail newspaper observed from Toronto. "It seems that China has put its hand over Hong Kong and there is now a lot more attention on places like Beijing and certainly Shanghai."

Britain's consul-general to Hong Kong, Stephen Bradley said that increasing numbers of foreign companies were clearly coming here, eager to do business, but the government had a broader perspective of its problems.

"The government may well feel that Hong Kong has become slightly lost in the China dazzle," Mr Bradley observed. "There is something to that in the sense that China has now become such a top story that in both business and government and the media, there is lots about China, but not much about Hong Kong. It's as if Hong Kong is lost from view in all the excitement."

Mr Tsang's overseas trips would be an opportunity to remind the outside world about the city's existence and that it was a good stepping stone from which to do business in China, he said. As a consistent policy approach, the "government's got to be right to bang the gong".

But many in the financial sector are confused as to why the government needs to promote Hong Kong and is seemingly forever worried about its international standing. American researcher David Meyer, a regular visitor and the author of Hong Kong is a Global Metropolis, ranked the city firmly beside New York and London when asked to name the top three global financial centres. He saw the position as strengthening, rather than diminishing in coming decades - mostly because of the growth of the Chinese and Indian economies.

"The interaction of the Indian and Chinese business communities is really going to enhance Hong Kong," the professor from Rhode Island's Brown University said. "It's not Mumbai or Shanghai - it's going to be Hong Kong as the pivot of the growth and integration of the economies of India and China. Hong Kong grows with that."

American business people had long been interested in Hong Kong and continued to see it as the perfect location for their Asia-Pacific headquarters. The world's top companies were operating from the city "because it's the global business centre of Asia and they've got to be there to operate effectively".

Professor Meyer believed government fears that the city was being sidelined by the mainland were unfounded. The "woe is us" attitude of some officials was not shared by business community executives, nor were attractions such as Disneyland vital to the future - New York had no such need for a Disneyland, so nor should Hong Kong. He considered improving the quality of life important, especially education standards and the environment, but said that foreign leaders were more worried about American foreign policy towards China or what would happen with Taiwan. Most importantly, though, the government needed to maintain a level playing field in which to do business, using US and British regulations as models.

Few doubt that Mr Tsang will get a friendly reception from Mr Bush and Mr Blair when he meets them. They are likely to be similarly praiseworthy of Hong Kong's achievements.

Former British foreign secretary Sir Geoffrey Howe said the anxieties in Britain about Hong Kong prior to 1997 had dissipated because of the impressive way the government had handled the transition.

"I'm delighted with the general pattern of what has subsequently happened," Sir Geoffrey told the Sunday Morning Post from London. "Many people would not have believed it possible for Hong Kong to maintain its forward march, to recover from the Asian economic storm as well as it did.

"I know it was a tough time while it lasted, but Hong Kong is still a very vibrant and dynamic and important economy, growing well now ... The atmosphere and style and quality seem remarkably unchanged."

Matters had been "handled with considerable respect for the Joint Declaration" and although the next stage towards universal suffrage was being eagerly looked towards, that eventuality was on the agenda.

Sir Geoffrey, who handled Britain's foreign affairs under prime minister Margaret Thatcher from 1983 to 1989, was intimately involved in hammering out the details of Hong Kong's return to China. The British government was still deeply interested in Hong Kong matters, he said.

Hong Kong and China expert at Oxford University's St Antony's College Steve Tsang Yui-sang, agreed that Britain was keeping a close watch on developments in the city.

"The UK has a vested interest in maintaining a positive image of Hong Kong because we want to make sure that things will go well," Dr Tsang observed. "What we used to have as a simple, straightforward obligation towards Hong Kong has become a moral obligation. If Hong Kong goes down the drain, it still will reflect very badly on the UK."

Many people living in Hong Kong held British passports, so it was in Britain's interest to ensure that the Special Administrative Region remained stable, he said. Nonetheless, he believed the city's image was less positive than it had been because of the financial difficulties encountered since 1997 and governance issues.

"It's more than just a matter of democracy or the lack of progress in that direction - it's also the general process of governance, of the way the government is managing the economy and the environment," Dr Tsang said. "Regrettably, we have not seen progress, but backwards developments in most of those areas."

One mistake that had been corrected was replacing Mr Tung, a move that was generally seen as being positive, he suggested. Britain's government now wanted Donald Tsang to be good for Hong Kong. There was "tremendous goodwill in wanting to see him be very successful".

Dr Tsang said such circumstances meant the chief executive would most likely not undergo tough questioning when he saw Mr Blair. "He will face a fairly friendly reception and general sympathy. But he may face some questions about whether he has really gone far enough in terms of changing, for example, the ministerial system of government."

With an easy ride during his first foreign trip likely, Mr Tsang's toughest moment may yet be choosing which bow ties to take with him.
 

For Jews, it isn't just a safety issue

Los Angeles Times

Susan Spano

August 29, 2004

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the L.A.-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, was wearing a yarmulke when I met him in June at a hotel near the Louvre. I've heard that Jewish American tourists coming to France have been counseled to wear baseball caps instead of yarmulkes to avoid becoming targets of anti-Semitic hate crimes. When I asked him about it, he raised his palms, smiled and said, "I am what I am."

Cooper's reaction was one in a range of responses to my questions about what American Jews think and feel about traveling to France, where anti-Semitism has reemerged into the open since the second Palestinian intifada in September 2000.

Attacks on Jewish schools, synagogues and cemeteries peaked in 2002, declined somewhat in 2003, then soared again in the first half of this year, when there were 135 incidents.

Every week, it seems, some new horror is reported in the French media, including the firebombing of a Jewish school outside Paris in November and the desecration late last month of Jewish tombstones in the Alsatian town of Saverne. On Aug. 22, a Jewish center in eastern Paris was set afire; the perpetrators drew swastikas and anti-Semitic slogans on the building.

The number of U.S. visitors to France has dropped by more than a million a year since 2000, but there are no statistics on what percentages of that number are due to anti-Semitism, fear of terrorism in general, resentment about French opposition to the war in Iraq or the weakening buying power of the dollar in Europe.

Travel experts have their own opinions.

"Although I love France and have traveled there many times, I am sad to report that travel to France by Jewish people has declined," said Sophia Kulich, a consultant for Westport, Conn.-based E&M Travel, which specializes in Jewish-interest trips. "We booked only a few people there this year. I do not believe it is due to terrorism or the exchange rate, since we send many people to Italy, the U.K., Spain and Portugal."

But Jo Goldenberg, French owner of a cherished deli in the old Jewish quarter of Paris on the Rue des Rosiers, scene of a 1982 bombing, thinks the anti-Semitism problem in France has been exaggerated. "There are tourists here anyway," Goldenberg said.

Rachel Kaplan, president of Medford, Mass.-based European Jewish Tours, reported that one client wanted to make sure the cars used for getting around Paris weren't marked with the company name.

"But the main deterrent for coming to France is the discrepancy between the dollar and the euro," she said in a phone interview. "The whole anti-Semitism thing has been blown out of proportion. People in America don't understand the context. The problems have occurred in places where tourists wouldn't go."

Violence against Jews and synagogues has occurred chiefly in the suburbs of major cities such as Lyon, Marseille and Paris, where young Muslim immigrants from North Africa — poor, socially disenfranchised, increasingly radicalized and themselves the targets of racism in France — are concentrated.

France is home to about 500,000 Jews (about the same as in all of L.A.) and 6 million Muslims, the largest population in Europe. Tension between these groups is unlikely to endanger the average Jewish American traveler, who wants to see central Paris — the Seine, the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre — not the tough suburbs.

Nevertheless, the upsurge in hate crimes against Jewish targets in France and other European countries prompted the Simon Wiesenthal Center, which monitors neo-Nazi activity, to issue an unprecedented travel advisory in April 2002, warning that Jewish visitors to France and Belgium should exercise caution. The center's Cooper told me the advisory was partly aimed at pressuring the French government into taking more decisive action against the perpetrators of anti-Jewish hate crimes.

Since then, the center has seen increased diligence on the part of the government to bring those responsible to justice, intensified policing of potential targets and a heightened effort to educate the public about anti-Semitism and racism in general. By the spring of 2003, the advisory for France was lifted (though the one for Belgium remains in effect, and another has been issued for Greece).

Anti-Semitism in France is a profoundly complex and sensitive subject, entangled with historical events, such as the Vichy government's deportation of Jews to Nazi death camps during World War II.

The question for Jewish travelers is, how will being in France make you feel?

Shelley Gazin, an L.A. photographer working on an exhibition and book about Jewish Paris, said she felt no fear on a recent visit to France, though the emotional issues were deep. "The history [of Jews in Paris] permeated my being," she said.

A Jewish friend in New York who adores Paris said that visiting the city prompted a moral struggle. Another friend said only unsophisticated tourists would quail at the prospect of visiting France.

Everyone's answer will be different. It's a matter of listening to your head and heart, then weighing potential emotional and psychological discomfort against the indisputable pleasures of France, still the world's most popular travel destination.

 

Susan Spano also writes "Postcards From Paris," which can be read at http://www.latimes.com/susanspano . You may e-mail her at postcards@latimes.com. She cannot respond individually.